EPA will open #MATS rule for review despite utility objections RSS Feed

EPA will open MATS rule for review despite utility objections

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will reconsider the justification behind the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), a major Obama-era air regulation responsible for the closure of scores of coal power plants.

The EPA will review the regulation’s emissions standards, as well as the agency’s justification that the rules were “appropriate and necessary” in the first place, spokesperson Molly Block said in an email. The agency will release proposed changes after an interagency review process expected to take 60-90 days, she said.

Most coal plants have either installed pollution controls to comply with MATS or have shut down, and utilities wrote to EPA last month asking it to keep the MATS regulation in place. Any proposed rollback is likely to be met with legal challenges from environmental groups and liberal states.

Because utilities are largely compliant with the MATS regulation today, the EPA’s review is not likely to have major impacts on the existing generation fleet. It could, however, affect how EPA crafts air regulations in the future.

The interagency review is part of a broader initiative at EPA to reconsider how the agency views “co-benefits,” or health impacts of a rule that come from reductions in pollutants not directly covered by the regulation.

In the case of MATS, conservatives and industry groups criticized EPA for partially justifying the regulation with benefits that came from reducing particulate emissions, rather than the mercury, dioxins and other pollutants directly targeted by the rule.

Consideration of co-benefits was a key element in the EPA’s decision to keep the core of the MATS rule in place after the Supreme Court ordered it to review its cost-benefit analysis in 2015. The agency expects the rule to cost $9.6 billion annually, but in a supplemental finding a year later said that the health benefits were worth the price tag.

Read full article at Utility Dive