How #IPL wants FERC to transform MISO energy storage tariffs RSS Feed

How IPL wants FERC to transform MISO energy storage tariffs

he utility says current storage rules were intended for flywheels and would degrade batteries too quickly

The first energy storage project in the Midcontinent ISO is up and running, but it is not being compensated for the services it is providing in the MISO footprint.

Indianapolis Power & Light’s 20 MW, 20 MWh Harding Street storage facility went into service in May, but as valuable as those batteries may be, there is no regulatory path for IPL to get paid.

IPL is working on that problem, but it could be a heavy lift.

Late last month, IPL filed a complaint with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, asking the regulator to find that MISO’s rules for energy storage are deficient and should be revised.

The fast track complaint seeks three changes. IPL wants to see MISO revise its tariff for primary frequency regulation (PFR) by unbundling it and paying locational marginal prices (LMP) for the service under its own schedule. Because it is an automated function, current rules do not consider PFR to be a market operation because there is no bid and dispatch function.

The utility also wants MISO to revise its dispatch protocols for secondary frequency control. As currently designed, lithium-ion batteries wanting to participate in the MISO market would be forced to operate in a way that would degrade their batteries quicker than usual.

Those protocols were designed for flywheel storage devices, but forcing li-ion batteries to provide one hour of injection and one hour of withdrawal prevents batteries from “being used in the most valuable manner,” the filing says.

Cell life of the Harding Street battery would be reduced to three years, instead of the 10 years if it were cycled properly, IPL argues. IPL also wants to be paid, not charged, the LMP when withdrawing power from the grid in response to frequency deviations.

Thirdly, IPL wants MISO to broaden the services battery storage can provide to include ancillary services, energy, ramping, and capacity. IPL argues that MISO’s definition of a storage energy resource (SER) was designed solely for the operating characteristics of flywheels and limits them to providing regulation services. IPL wants to see restrictions on the products that can be provided by all types of resource lifted.

In the filing, IPL says, “The Commission should direct that the Tariff be reformed so that Resources technically capable of providing various products under the Tariff be permitted to provide such products, regardless of resource label or technology.”

MISO’s existing storage rules were, in fact, designed with flywheel technology in mind. They came out of a similar filing to IPL’s that Beacon Energy made with FERC. The irony is that the rules were never needed because Beacon went bankrupt in 2011. (The company has since emerged from bankruptcy.)

IPL knew MISO’s rules were not favorable for battery storage back in 2009 when it began developing plans for the Harding Street storage project, and it was hopeful that those issues would be addressed.

“We thought we would be able to tweak the regulations, but that didn’t happen,” Lin Franks, senior strategist for RTO, FERC and compliance Initiatives at IPL, told Utility Dive.

IPL embarked on the project “with open eyes,” she said, but “it is hard for any stakeholder to know everything under [MISO’s] hood.” RTOs are complex and many times problems do not become apparent until a project is implemented, she said.

Read full article at Utility Dive